A functional imaging IT contract enhances vendor performance over the long haul
advertisement
Aktueller Standort:
>
> This Story


Log in oder Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

Health IT Homepage

Actively regulated EHR standards are driving demand for outsourcing critical functionality Staying ahead of the curve as SCRIPT17 deadline approaches

Patient record breaches in 2019 already double the total from last year Report finds almost 32 million patient record breaches, compared to 15 million in 2018

Kaiser Permanente team standardizes definition of complete imaging history Developed prompts to help in order entry process

Everyone’s part in the perfect EMR Tips for optimizing your facility's approach to patient data

Getting physicians to embrace telehealth By 2025 the U.S. telemedicine market is expected to exceed $64 billion

Browser beware: Study uncovers data leaks that could impact health IT Chrome and Firefox extensions may cause vulnerability

Carestream completes sale of IT business to Philips in most countries Now part of Philips in 26 of 38 countries where it operates

The building block(chain) of healthcare’s future? Insights from Eliot Siegel on what needs to happen for blockchain to improve the industry

Neurologica agrees to discounts for Strategic Radiology members Discounts on digital radiography and ultrasound, software and services

US leading digital health record adoption, but falls behind elsewhere: Philips report Country rates poorly in use of telemedicine and AI

A functional imaging IT contract enhances vendor performance over the long haul

by John W. Mitchell , Senior Correspondent
In a session near the close of the recent SIIM Conference in Aurora, Colorado, four imaging informatics managers shared tips on creating contracts for effective vendor relationships. The takeaway: a good contract should strengthen the relationship and head off any disputes.

The four experts on the panel for the session, entitled For Project Leaders: Preparing for Successful Contract Negotiations were:

Story Continues Below Advertisement

THE (LEADER) IN MEDICAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY SINCE 1982. SALES-SERVICE-REPAIR

Special-Pricing Available on Medical Displays, Patient Monitors, Recorders, Printers, Media, Ultrasound Machines, and Cameras.This includes Top Brands such as SONY, BARCO, NDS, NEC, LG, EDAN, EIZO, ELO, FSN, PANASONIC, MITSUBISHI, OLYMPUS, & WIDE.



Donald Dennison (moderator), president, Don K. Dennison Solutions Inc.
Stephen Besselman, project manager, El Camino Hospital
Robert Coleman, senior director imaging informatics, Maine Medical Center
Michael Toland, PACS team manager, University of Maryland Medical Center


The interactive session took on a question and answer format. Here are some of the highlights by general topics.

Before entering into contract actions, such as an RFP or demonstrations, what are some of the things that an IT manager can do be more prepared?

Besselman: We used an outside consultant who prepared an extensive pre-screening questionnaire. We referred back to those questions during the vendor screening to make sure they could do what they said they could do.

Toland: The more info and details we can share with vendors, the better. The first thing we provided is the organization’s standard purchase agreement, so they go could through and do their redlines (proposed changes). We post our service line agreement that vendors have to live by, and we can check to see which vendors read it.

Coleman: When you enter into a contract, it’s really starting a relationship. In some cases, you’re going to be living with a vendor for years — I have some vendors I’ve been with my whole career. We use a very vigorous technical review about ten pages long.

Dennison: Remember, your general counsel doesn’t need a PACS, you do, so come up with practical thresholds. A one-sided contract won’t work for anyone. Think about the performance measures you need that will help a vendor anticipate a problem. Three common contract metrics are 1 — service uptime (planned and unplanned); 2 — the speed of the system performance and how fast and how many images can be read; 3 — the vendor response and resolution times.

What is your approach to contract details, such as the service agreement, statement of work, and cybersecurity?

Coleman: How many of us in this room have gotten a phone call from a radiologist who says, "PACS is slow today.”? We all hate those calls. So, it’s important to define success and failure in the service agreement. What is slow and how slow is the system running? There need to be penalties for lack of performance. Remember, vendors are not going to want to put real teeth in a service agreement.
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Health IT Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment