Ethics in artificial intelligence — many questions, but few answers
advertisement
Aktueller Standort:
>
> This Story


Log in oder Register to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

Artificial Intelligence Homepage

Terason to integrate DiA cardiology AI in point-of-care ultrasounds Offer more accurate and objective imaging assessments

PHDA and Amazon Web Services team up in machine learning healthcare sponsorship Aiming to enhance medical imaging, precision medicine and cancer diagnostics

GE and Australian partners to develop AI for brain aneurysm tracking and diagnosis Will prevent brain hemorrhaging

AI solution distinguishes complex pathologies for accurate breast cancer diagnosis Classify ductal carcinoma in situ from atypia

Half of US hospital leaders surveyed are unfamiliar with premise of AI Less than a quarter are currently seeking to implement it

RadNet acquires Nulogix, opens new AI division Will develop applications for image interpretation

AI could enhance efficiency and accuracy of DBT, says study Can help reduce reading times for DBT

FUJIFILM SonoSite, Partners HealthCare to enhance point-of-care ultrasound with AI partnership Open access to affordable point-of-care ultrasound

Progenics collabs with VA on AI research for prostate cancer treatment Apply machine learning to medical images

AI tool deciphers unstructured data for monitoring tumor changes Just as efficient and faster at extracting data than humans

Ethics in artificial intelligence — many questions, but few answers

by John W. Mitchell , Senior Correspondent
The Socratic method was in full force over the matter of sharing patient data for AI algorithm deep learning during an afternoon session at SIIM 2019 titled Ethics in Radiology: the European and North American Multisociety Statement.

The interactive session intended to solicit input from SIIM expert attendees on a draft paper about the ethics of sharing patient data in both Europe and the U.S. Some of the authors, from Kenya, the Netherlands, and the U.S., seemed pleased with the responses that raised more questions than definitive answers.

Story Continues Below Advertisement

Servicing GE, Philips and Siemens CT equipment with OEM trained engineers

Numed, a well established company in business since 1975 provides a wide range of service options including time & material service, PM only contracts, full service contracts, labor only contracts & system relocation. Call 800 96 Numed for more info.



Participating groups include American College of Radiology (ACR), European Society of Radiology (ESR), Radiology Society of North America (RSNA), Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR), Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM), European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics (EuSoMII), and American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM).

Moderator Dr. J. Raymond Geis, assistant clinical professor of radiology at the University of Colorado, acknowledged that the topic was still unsettled and radiologists and others have strong opinions about the matter. His colleagues — Dr. Judy Gichoya, fellow and interventional radiologist at Oregon Health & Sciences University's Dotter Institute, and Dr. Erik Ranschaert, radiologist at the Netherlands Cancer Institute — helped lead the interactive session.

"I sent the draft to a colleague at Princeton, and he shared it with his grad students," reported Geis. "They pretty much chewed my butt about some things.”

He made the point to reinforce that the paper, titled with the same name as the session, was very much a work in progress. The audience spent most of the 90-minute session highly engaged in discussing the topic.

The opening paragraph set the tome for the interactive session:

Artificial intelligence (AI), defined as computers that behave in ways that, until recently, were thought to require human intelligence, has the potential to substantially improve all facets of radiology. AI is complex, has numerous potential pitfalls, and is inevitably biased to some degree. Radiologists and all others who build and use radiology AI products have a duty to understand AI deeply, to provide the most benefit to patients, to understand when and how hazards manifest, to be transparent about benefits and risks, and as much as possible to mitigate any harm they might cause. AI will cause dramatic clinical, social and economic changes. Most changes will be positive, but some may be for the worse.
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Artificial Intelligence Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment